“J. Edgar”—Investigating the Investigator
Based upon a script by “Milk” screenwriter, Dustin Lance Black, and directed by Clint Eastwood, “J. Edgar” is a biopic of the controversial FBI director, J. Edgar Hoover. In this spellbinding movie, Leonardo DiCaprio, who plays Hoover, ages five decades, as he grows from an ambitious young law enforcer to the most powerful, controversial, and intimidating FBI director the US has ever known. Even presidents feared him.
“J. Edgar” depicts Hoover’s early career (the 1930’s), including raids on Communist “radicals” and organized crime, the Lindbergh kidnapping, and his most brazen surveillance for the purpose of destroying the presidency of John Kennedy, the career of Robert Kennedy, as well as that of Martin Luther King. However, it is the secret life of Hoover that is the most compelling and successful part of the narrative, because the film tries to humanize him. For a man whose life was devoted to extracting and exploiting the secrets of other powerful men and women, Hoover’s own secret life as a closeted homosexual takes central stage as the biography moves between his lifelong relationship with his protégé, Clyde Tolson (superbly played by Armie Hammer) and his domineering, demented mother (the always exceptional Judi Dench).
Hoover’s own obsessive-compulsive tendencies–his hidden psychic wounds– drive his relentless concern with his image and the image of the FBI. Ironically, the primal image of the name “J. Edgar Hoover” today denotes government investigation gone rogue.
The structure of the movie and its cinematography, however, are the weakest elements of “J. Edgar”. The overdone flashbacks disconnect important events by decades–moving from the Lindbergh kidnapping to long scenes of the civil rights movement of the 1960’s and then back to the Lindbergh kidnapping and trial. Eastwood shoots this story in a washed-out sepia color palette for most of the scenes from the 1930’s through early 50’s with more color added as the dramatic 1960’s emerge in the story. But these visual cues are not enough to maintain a seamless continuity of events. This is the best movie Eastwood has directed of the last four (the other three being “Changeling”, “Invictus”, and “Hereafter”) but not among the best he has done (“Letters to Iwo Jima”, “Mystic River”, “Million Dollar Baby”). Nonetheless, I highly recommend this movie for the actors’ bravura performances–especially DiCaprio’s, which defines his career to date.
***Possible spoiler alert!***The scene where DiCaprio dresses in his deceased mother’s clothes triggers a similar scene from “Psycho” and is well worth an Academy nomination in itself for DiCaprio’s chilling, wordless performance!
Eugene
Good review…I would add that Edgar comes across as a sad, scared man…that contrasted with the public image he wished to portray as the number 1 G man….
Jerry Ludwig
Enjoyed your “Hoover” review — made me want to see the movie, which is the best thing a critic can do! I’ll let you know what we think.
kathleen biersteker
Thanks, Diana. I haven’t seen the movie but enjoyed your review. Kathleen
Celeste Wahl
I wondered why I didn’t like this film and you hit it on the proverbial head. The structure and the cinematography were feeble. The flashbacks with the stand-in Nixon were ineffective, almost comical.
Though I beg to differ with you on one point. “Invictus” was almost flawless. Eastwood managed to find that line between history and a sense of style. He’s come a long way from Rowdy Yates. 🙂